ISO-MME

Dear Colleagues,

due to user request please find attached the preliminary code database including the QB-Dummy as discussed in:
viewtopic.php?f=38&t=569&p=1015#p1015

The complete database will follow soon.

Best regards

Ingo Wülfing
on behalf of Dirk Vetter

It seems that there is a change how to handle the "testnumber", "laboratory test reference number" and "customer test reference number" within the ISO MME 2.0 in comparison to earlier versions?

ISO/DTR 13499 (ISO-EGV)
In ISO/DTR 13499 adopted by the German workgroup for impact test ...

Chapter 2.8 (ISO/TS 13499 – RED A : 2014(E)) does include the valid values for the descriptor 'Movie images corrected'.
The valid values are 'YES' and 'NO'.
Therefore the descriptor in chapter 1.3.6.1 has the data type 'coded' and the remark 'see 2.8'.
But for the additional biomechanical ...

Hello Members,

ISO TS 13499 is a data exchange format.
Therefore it seems advisable that everybody undertands it right and it will be used in the same manner.

The hint for the additional info of the test objects can lead to some misunderstandings, as we see it from our customer response. This is ...

As we want to use the ISO-MME 2.0 in the future I mentioned some issues with the physical units which make it quite inconvenient to work with this new "standard".

Issues
1. For the same physical dimension there should be used the same unit in all data and information files.
I found same ...

While mapping the ISO-MME standard to a database the testobject reference seems to be missing in the
moving image information file and the static measurement data file, whereas the photo information file has this reference as a mandatory field descriptor.

Comparing ISO-MME 1.x with ISO-MME 2.0 ...

Hello to the members of the forum!

Has anybody already used the RibEye™ multi-point deflection measurement system from Boxboro Systems
(http://www.boxborosystems.com/products.html)

I would suggest to use the existing main locations and 'DS' for the dimension (e.g. 11RIBSRI01H3DSXP, ...).

For the ...

I agree with the need to add a main location for an actuator, but I would prefer to add a more general main location like "actuator = ACTU or ACTR".
The dimension of the measurement should be defined by the ISO code position 13..14.
Possible channels could be, e.g.:
**ACTU******AC**
**ACTU******FO ...