Search found 8 matches

by wuelfing
Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:20 am
Forum: Database (1.6.x / 2.x)
Topic: Preliminary MME Code Database 1.6 Rev 2 Proposal 3
Replies: 2
Views: 4069

Preliminary MME Code Database 1.6 Rev 2 Proposal 3

Dear Colleagues,

due to user request please find attached the preliminary code database including the QB-Dummy as discussed in:
viewtopic.php?f=38&t=569&p=1015#p1015

The complete database will follow soon.

Best regards

Ingo Wülfing
on behalf of Dirk Vetter
by wuelfing
Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:14 pm
Forum: MME 2.0 discussion
Topic: "testnumber" <-> "laboratory/customer test reference number"
Replies: 0
Views: 5101

"testnumber" <-> "laboratory/customer test reference number"

It seems that there is a change how to handle the "testnumber", "laboratory test reference number" and "customer test reference number" within the ISO MME 2.0 in comparison to earlier versions? ISO/DTR 13499 (ISO-EGV) In ISO/DTR 13499 adopted by the German workgroup for...
by wuelfing
Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:33 pm
Forum: MME 2.0 discussion
Topic: Coded Values and Data type 'boolean'
Replies: 0
Views: 3652

Coded Values and Data type 'boolean'

Chapter 2.8 (ISO/TS 13499 – RED A : 2014(E)) does include the valid values for the descriptor 'Movie images corrected'. The valid values are 'YES' and 'NO'. Therefore the descriptor in chapter 1.3.6.1 has the data type 'coded' and the remark 'see 2.8'. But for the additional biomechanical testobject...
by wuelfing
Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:37 am
Forum: Clarification
Topic: Additional info of the test objects
Replies: 0
Views: 5182

Additional info of the test objects

Hello Members, ISO TS 13499 is a data exchange format. Therefore it seems advisable that everybody undertands it right and it will be used in the same manner. The hint for the additional info of the test objects can lead to some misunderstandings, as we see it from our customer response. This is not...
by wuelfing
Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:51 am
Forum: MME 2.0 discussion
Topic: Unit issues in ISO-MME 2.0
Replies: 0
Views: 3901

Unit issues in ISO-MME 2.0

As we want to use the ISO-MME 2.0 in the future I mentioned some issues with the physical units which make it quite inconvenient to work with this new "standard". Issues 1. For the same physical dimension there should be used the same unit in all data and information files. I found same di...
by wuelfing
Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:17 pm
Forum: MME 2.0 discussion
Topic: Testobject reference in movie and static info file
Replies: 1
Views: 4787

Testobject reference in movie and static info file

While mapping the ISO-MME standard to a database the testobject reference seems to be missing in the moving image information file and the static measurement data file, whereas the photo information file has this reference as a mandatory field descriptor. Comparing ISO-MME 1.x with ISO-MME 2.0 regar...
by wuelfing
Tue Aug 18, 2009 8:22 am
Forum: Additional codes
Topic: ISO Codes for RibEye™ Multi-point Deflection Measurement
Replies: 4
Views: 10364

ISO Codes for RibEye™ Multi-point Deflection Measurement

Hello to the members of the forum! Has anybody already used the RibEye™ multi-point deflection measurement system from Boxboro Systems (http://www.boxborosystems.com/products.html) I would suggest to use the existing main locations and 'DS' for the dimension (e.g. 11RIBSRI01H3DSXP, ...). For the S2 ...
by wuelfing
Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:16 am
Forum: Additional codes
Topic: New MainLocation for Force Actors
Replies: 3
Views: 5427

Re: New MainLocation for Force Actors

I agree with the need to add a main location for an actuator, but I would prefer to add a more general main location like "actuator = ACTU or ACTR". The dimension of the measurement should be defined by the ISO code position 13..14. Possible channels could be, e.g.: **ACTU******AC** **ACTU...

Go to advanced search