Hello Dirk,
thanks for your quick reply and your suggestions.
I prefer
A) "EC": "Electrical Capacity"
as I believe this to be more defined compared to "CA"; nevertheless I'm open for other ideas / suggestions as long as we agree on something.
Regards
Thomas
Search found 7 matches
- Wed Dec 04, 2019 8:00 am
- Forum: Additional codes
- Topic: new physical dimension electrical capacity / Farad
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7426
- Tue Dec 03, 2019 3:06 pm
- Forum: Additional codes
- Topic: new physical dimension electrical capacity / Farad
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7426
new physical dimension electrical capacity / Farad
In order to measure the capacity / remaining capacity I would like to add explicitly the unit
Farad / electrical capacity
to the database.
Regards
Thomas
Farad / electrical capacity
to the database.
Regards
Thomas
- Wed Aug 29, 2018 7:50 am
- Forum: Clarification
- Topic: S2 - ILAC additional measurment locations (latest proposal 1.6.2_proposal_2)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6193
S2 - ILAC additional measurment locations (latest proposal 1.6.2_proposal_2)
Hello guys,
the measurement locations for
ILAC[LE/RI][FR/RE]S2FOY
in the dummy figures of the sidIIs (additional instrumentation) are no longer included in the proposal.
Is there a certain reason?
Regards,
Thomas
the measurement locations for
ILAC[LE/RI][FR/RE]S2FOY
in the dummy figures of the sidIIs (additional instrumentation) are no longer included in the proposal.
Is there a certain reason?
Regards,
Thomas
- Fri Jun 08, 2018 12:20 pm
- Forum: Clarification
- Topic: Number of Samples: 0 VALID?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4411
Number of Samples: 0 VALID?
Hello guys,
so far I haven't found anything in the ISO which specifically forbids zero samples in a channel file.
Is
Number of Samples: 0
valid?
(The question is not if it's making any sense).
Cheers!
Thomas
so far I haven't found anything in the ISO which specifically forbids zero samples in a channel file.
Is
Number of Samples: 0
valid?
(The question is not if it's making any sense).
Cheers!
Thomas
- Wed Jul 06, 2016 8:35 am
- Forum: Additional codes
- Topic: New Fine Location 3 for "Interactive Airbag"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8158
Re: New Fine Location 3 for "Interactive Airbag"
Some example channels: 1 2 AIRB0000 GI EV00 - Interaction Airbag front 1 5 AIRB0000 GI EV00 - Interaction Airbag rear 1 2 AIRB0000 GI VO0P - ignition voltage Interaction Airbag front 1 5 AIRB0000 GI VO0P - ignition voltage Interaction Airbag rear 1 2 AIRB0000 GI CU0P - ignition current Interaction A...
- Tue Jun 21, 2016 2:18 pm
- Forum: Additional codes
- Topic: New Fine Location 3 for "Interactive Airbag"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8158
Re: New Fine Location 3 for "Interactive Airbag"
Dear Dirk, your interpretation is absolutely correct; it should prevent occupant interaction. Regarding your question of the SP in the second row. In my opinion it depends on the configuration the airbag is used in. My intention - at the moment - is to use SP5 as it is only used in 4-seater - nevert...
- Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:05 pm
- Forum: Additional codes
- Topic: New Fine Location 3 for "Interactive Airbag"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8158
New Fine Location 3 for "Interactive Airbag"
Dear colleagues, I would like to propose a new fine flocation three for the Interactive Airbag and the related generator. The currently available airbag types (generators) are AF - frontal airbag (GF) AH - head airbag (GH) AP - pedestrian airbag (GP) AR - rear airbag (GR) AS - side airbag (GS) As ne...