ISO-MME

Hello,

please find in the new attachement the addoption to new naming "TOB x": MME_descriptors_for_active_safety.pdf

As an other idea:
Wouldn't it be easier to shicht to a list of ditonary of tuples (see https://iso-mme.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=725 )
So this
.Shape Front TOB x : (x1;y1) (x2;y2 ...

Hello

I would like to propose an extension of the data types in the RED A in order to be able to map more complex data structures as individual values (e.g. coordinates, hit points, etc.).
In addition to the data types “tuple and “triple”, lists and dictionaries based on these are also helpful ...

Hello,

this proposal is quite old, but I support the proposal of MLOC LOWT and CRSL.
We should agree on the differentiation of "Child Restraint Seat" and "Static Force Application Device".
The Static Force Application Device (MLOC SFAD) can also have a support leg. This should be named as a part of ...

Hello,

I support this idea of this descriptor “lateral velocity” and the shortened “TOB” for the test object.
“TOB” would be a benefit for many new descriptors in ISO MME due to the restriction to 28 characters.

Best regards
Martin

Hello,

here is an update of to TOB instead of TO.
I have also added more details in definition of ".Nominal Heading TOB X".

Best regards,
Martin

Hello everyone,

some time ago we agreed on attributes for nominal velocities of test objects to determine validities:
Nominal vel. test object X
Nom. lat. vel. test object x

For different test scenarios it would be helpfull to have several nominal velocities (e.g. speed limiter, CCRb,...).
Could ...

Hello everyone,

I suggest to add an "adult pedestrian with baby stroller" as possible target. The code for ISO main location would be:

PABS Adult with baby stroller

There was a possible target like this referenced in https://iso-mme.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1347#p1347 .

Kind regards,
Martin

Hello,

here are some ideas and remarks to the propoal of Euro NCAP to integarte the attibutes in ISO13499 RED F.

There are some new proposals for MME attributes:
.Nom. Heading test object X
.Pos. Offset test object X
.Striking point TO X
.Overlap VUT to TO X

But also differences in naming which ...

Hello,

please find attached the current list of mme attributes MME_descriptors_for_active_safety.pdf

How are you about the idea to allow the use of “TOB” instead of “test object” in the attribute. Due to the restriction of 28 characters it is hard to find good attribute names.
This would also ...

Hello,

I support the approach of using a tuple here.
In active security, there was also the suggestion for an attribute ". VUT striking point" (or ". Striking point TOB X"). We could combine both requirements here in a new attribute like "Striking point TO X", “Striking point test object X” or ...

Hello,

here is an update of the proposal for RED F:
ISO_TS13499_RED_F_20231117.pdf

I have added the results from the following discussions to this document:
Proposal for main locations of different targets
Additional coordinate system for lateral and longitudinal distance
Proposal on new ...

Hello,

here is an update of my suggestions for main locations and fine locations:
Proposals_ISO_ML_FL.xlsx

I want to address with new main locations a new approach for distance channels between two test objects. In the past, the same channel was used for different locations. I take use of the ...

Hello Dirk,

most of the main location will represent a constant value channel. The TTTC has as unit "s" and is not a constant value channel.
Most of the main location can be used for several channels.
For example TDOP (all constant value):
11TDOP0100CBEV00 FT FS Tuer Status (CAN) - Event door ...

Hello,

in addition to https://www.iso-mme.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=653 I want to suggest the following main and fine locations for active safety:
Proposals_ISO_ML_FL.xlsx

These main location will allow to give functions / vehicle reactions more comprehensible names.
The fine locations will ...

Hello,

in order to be able to determine distances between two test objects or to fixed points/objects on the test ground for vehicles with any trajectories above the test ground, a separate coordinate system is required. This coordinate system should not rotate with the test object, but retains ...