Proposal 8 - Open issue - Reference system id

that which may, or may not, be in version 2.0!
Locked
derpmann
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:32 am
Location: Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg - Germany

Proposal 8 - Open issue - Reference system id

Post by derpmann »

Should the descriptor Reference system id in channel files be mandatory or optional

In proposal 8 the descriptor .Reference system id is optional (see RED A 1.3.4.1)

Problems:
  • 3) If the descriptor is unnecessary the Codeextension don't have to be omitted.

Solutions:
  • A) The descriptor is mandatory.
  • B) The descriptor is optional.
  • C) The descriptor is unnecessary.
  • D) I describe another solution.
My preference:
I prefer solution C.
D: A second solution would be B in conjunction with open issue
http://www.iso-mme.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=150 solution C (-> optional, but without a dot)
User avatar
Paul Wellicome
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:20 pm
Company: HORIBA MIRA Ltd
Location: HORIBA MIRA Ltd, England

Re: Proposal 8 - Open issue - Reference system id

Post by Paul Wellicome »

Open Issue – reference system id

Note – LOC needs to be removed from table 2.3 in RED-A!

We decided to adopt solution C) [The descriptor is unnecessary.]
Locked

Return to “MME 2.0 discussion”