WorldSID (WS) - 20130301 revision
-
Paul Wellicome
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:20 pm
- Company: HORIBA MIRA Ltd
- Location: HORIBA MIRA Ltd, England
WorldSID (WS) - 20130301 revision
In the light of the Excel workbook circulated after the on-line meeting of 27 February 2013, here is a revised WS PDF.
- Attachments
-
- ISO-WS_20130301.pdf
- ISO-WS 2013-03-01, PDF, 4 pages
- (790.67 KiB) Downloaded 795 times
Re: WorldSID (WS) - 20130301 revision
why do we call at S2 ??SHRI00LES2ACX? and we call it different at WS like ??SHRILE00WSACX?
Is there a good reason to call same things in a different way?
Gerd
Is there a good reason to call same things in a different way?
Gerd
-
Paul Wellicome
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:20 pm
- Company: HORIBA MIRA Ltd
- Location: HORIBA MIRA Ltd, England
Re: WorldSID (WS) - 20130301 revision
Gerd,
ths only reason to have this name for the channel on the S2 is that it is historically consistent. A mistake was made a long time ago. The ISOMME task force has considered changing the channel to meet the naming convention, but decided that this would cause more problems than it solved. So, it is what it is, mistakes and all!
ths only reason to have this name for the channel on the S2 is that it is historically consistent. A mistake was made a long time ago. The ISOMME task force has considered changing the channel to meet the naming convention, but decided that this would cause more problems than it solved. So, it is what it is, mistakes and all!
Paul.